Variable ID	Trait	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number	Method	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number	Scale	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number
370	Mean(R) ABA	PTO	TO:0000257	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			unit	UO	UO:0000000
371	Mean(LRL) ABA	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
372	Mean(LR.no) ABA	PTO	TO:0001013	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			count unit	UO	UO:0000189
373	Mean(P2) ABA	PTO	TO:0000227	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
374	Mean(LRD P) ABA	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
375	Mean(LRD R) ABA	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
376	Mean(TLRL) ABA	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
377	Mean(TRL) ABA	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
378	Mean(LRR) ABA	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
