Variable ID	Trait	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number	Method	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number	Scale	Term Source REF	Term Accession Number
379	Mean(R) CK	PTO	TO:0000257	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			unit	UO	UO:0000000
380	Mean(LRL) CK	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
381	Mean(LR.no) CK	PTO	TO:0001013	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			count unit	UO	UO:0000189
382	Mean(P2) CK	PTO	TO:0000227	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
383	Mean(LRD P) CK	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
384	Mean(LRD R) CK	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
385	Mean(TLRL) CK	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
386	Mean(TRL) CK	PTO	TO:0001012	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			millimeter	UO	UO:0000016
387	Mean(LRR) CK	PTO	TO:0000115	After 3 days of treatment, plates were scanned with CCD flatbed scanners (EPSON Perfection V600 Photo, Seiko Epson, Nagano, Japan), and images used to quantify root parameters with FIJI, by using the tool ‘segmented line’ (Schindelin et al., 2012) as described in Ristova and Busch (2017). In particular, we quantified: primary root length on day 10 (P), growth rate of P after treatment (P2), branching zone or the length of P between the first and last visible lateral root (R), average lateral root length (LRL), and visible lateral root number (LR.No).			mass density unit	UO	UO:0000052
